Pirates, Con-men, Wizards, and Colonialists

I was thinking about a fun piece that I could show off my skills. In doing this, I knew that I needed to know the pieces inside and out. This lead me to analyzing these different musicals. During the past four years, I had been a part of all four of the musicals. I will be using Michael Ryan’s Literary Theory: A Practical Introduction (Second Edition) for all of the musicals. If anyone is unfamiliar with the musicals, the link leads to Wikipedia. Depending on the user’s viewpoint, a work can be interpreted in different ways to allow support to an argument. Before I analyze the text, I will point out the at least two other schools that could be used to analyze a piece.

1. Pirates of Penzance– Marxist

Though there is plenty of material for a potential feminist perspective or rhetoric, the main criticism revolves around the Marxism. Marxism, though thought to be mainly a financially perspective, is also influenced by the social order. According to Marx, the financial and social situations were intertwined into the core of society. Those with control of the market are also in control of the social structure. Ryan says in his book, “Because material inequality is difficult to justify in itself, ideas and cultural values have become increasingly important for maintaining the unequal distribution of wealth” (115). The Major General is not so much concerned in the marriage of his daughters. Most of the conflict comes from the socio-economic background of the pirates. He needs some way to justify his disgust of the pirates. He assumes, as many people would, that the pirates are poor and have no background in the elite world. The Major General even has a song about how smart and educated he is. In addition to that, the police officers are of a social class comparatively lower than the pirates. The daughters do not even think of the police as potential suitors. The daughters basically tell the police officers to die and asking the pirates mercy is vain. The end result has the Major General letting his daughters marrying the pirates only after evidence is presented that most, if not all, of the pirates are of noble birth. Only then, the pirates are socio-economically equal to the girls. Therefore, it is right for them to marry.

2. The Music Man– Historical

This musical has plenty of material for examining the rhetoric and marxist, yet to get the full effect, the historical must be examined. For the Historical perspective, the history of the play must be examined. Ryan opens his chapter on History with “Arguments about the meaning of a literary text are often easily settled by turning to history” (159). The Music Man was premiered in 1957. Though the US was in the middle of the Cold War, it was a simpler time. There was no longer the threat of being in an active war situation. These were the new good times. The musical takes place in 1912. This is the time before the threat of Communism from Russia, the world wars, and the bomb. The innocence of the young boys is vital for the community. Harold Hill comes into town to make money. Without any material, he cannot earn the trust of the people he is trying to swindle. During “Ya Got Trouble,” Hill uses the fear of boys growing up too fast to make money. These boys however would be going to war in a few years. This war would ruin the innocence that Hill was going to exploit. In “Ya Got Trouble,” the greatest fear of the townspeople was that of the boys being immoral. This is while the World War I was a little more than two years away. World War I was the war that devastated Europe and set the wheels in motion for the Second World War.

3. The Wizard of Oz– Rhetoric

The feminist and psychological perspectives would both be good places to start, yet the rhetoric of The Wizard of Oz defines what this play is. The title character is not even seen until the second act. Even still, he is lost in a cloud of literal smoke and mirrors. “The field of rhetoric also encompasses the procedures and techniques one can use in working language to produce effects or make points” (48). The Wizards uses rhetoric to his advantage in the land of Oz. The Wizard does not even exist outside the limits that he sets. Everyone in the land believes that the Wizard is all-powerful. When the three characters ask for three abstract things, the Wizard gives them literal objects with a speech explaining why. Instead of a brain, the Scarecrow is given a diploma; the Tin Man is given a clock with ticking to resemble a heartbeat; the Lion is given a medal. Yet with a speech accompanying each, the characters are satisfied. Also with a speech, the Wizard hands control of the country to the Scarecrow without a single contention from anyone in the crowd.  His rhetoric bedazzles the people. Compare this to the Winkies. They are glad and supposedly set up a different government after the Wicked Witch is dead. She does not rule by rhetoric but instead uses fear tactics to keep the Winkies under her command.

4. Jesus Christ Superstar– Post-colonialism

Jesus Christ Superstar shows strong indications of post-modernism and historical. Yet, the school of post-colonialism is a fascinating criticism. It is the study of countries that were or are under colonialism. During the musical, Israel is under the control of the Roman empire. Ryan states, “Once injected into the local cultures, it is combined with nationalist yearning for independence that proved potently combustible” (195). Though Ryan is talking about modern European nations, this is also true in Israel. Ironically, Sir Webber is from England one of the world’s most aggressive imperialist until the Empire fell apart. Judas starts the musical thinking about how the ministry is becoming too large. It is so large that the Romans might find it a threat. On the other hand, another of the disciples thinks that the ministry could be used to take down the Romans. This would force the Romans to leave Israel for the Romans. The priest use the Roman occupation to their advantage. Judas comes to them with the intentions of just stopping the ministry not knowing the priest’s plans. He realizes later that he would be blamed for Jesus’ death. The high priest stands next to the Roman counting the number of lashes.

Now that you have read that lengthy piece, here are a couple of Things Musical Taught Me. All four of this come from this Tumblr. There are also lessons from other musicals.

Words of Wisdom for the Brave New World

It is about time to go back to school. Therefore across the country, freshmen are receiving wisdom from the upperclassmen. This is no different than my Alma Mater. There are people getting ready to help the freshman and transfers get adjusted into SWU life. Last year, a friend and myself made a list of advice that we would give. Since I am transitioning to a new life, I feel like the advice is applicable to every time for transition. Before you read any of this, I am not perfect. I still struggle to with a couple of these areas. Every word I write is affirmation to make it though.

1. People will be better than you at things you are good at.

Bill Nye has been quoted to say, “Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don’t.”  It may be disappointing when you see someone exceeding at something that you think is your thing. Yet, that is a fact of life. There is no need to sabotage that person. It might even be an opportunity to learn. It might be as simple as asking the person for pointers, or if you are so inclined, you may be able to watch the person. Do not be a stalker or a creeper though. Just learn enough to help you on your journey.

2. Don’t compare yourself to others.

What? I tell you that people will be better than you, and then, you are not allowed to compare yourself. There is a difference between the two. The first is admitting a fact, and the other is something that can lead to some rough places. Nothing comes from comparing yourself and doing nothing about it. See, the majority of the problem come from focusing on what you are doing wrong. This is about this that sort of comparison.

3. Don’t quit.

Catherine Tate is my role model. She was my favorite companion in Doctor Who and is stunning in Much Ado About Nothing. This has been circulating the Internet and has helped me through the past couple of months:

This past year was very tough for me. There were days where I wanted to do just that. There are still some days that I want to do that. Yet, I have also had some wonderful days.  I would not have traded those days where I was shining for days being shut away. If one dreams dies, there has to be another dream somewhere.

4. Don’t Change Yourself for Others.

There are two types of change: for oneself and for others. It is very easy to change for others. Yet, they always seem to have another motive. Don’t change just to belong. There are other people who will embrace you the way that you are. Change because it will make you a better person. Change because you cannot stay the same. Ask people to help you through your change.  Yet even in the change, never compromise your own style. If the helpers are supportive, they can deal with your will to be true to yourself. If they are not supportive, you may not need them.

5. Take care of yourself.

Please take care of yourself. Don’t get so obsessed with someone else’s stuff that you forget your own needs. Sleep can be forgotten trying to solve the problems of the world. Yet, don’t let that control your life. In the School of Education at my college, they had a Christian Ethic of Care. The ethic is about how teachers should take care of students and parents and colleagues and community people. Yet before we take care of any of these other people, we were supposed to take care of the self first. We are told that we cannot be an impact to others while we are not at our best.

Case for “Bad” Books

Note: The word “bad” is reference to the plot development or character development. It has no ethical meaning and is not related to the contents of the book. When that sort of thing happens, it is an all around coincidence. 

GK Chesterton wrote in Heretics, “A good novel tells the truth about its hero; but a bad novel tells the truth about its author. It does much more than that, it tells us the truth about its readers.”

Recently, Goodreads had an infographic with 5 modern and 5 classic books that people normally are discarded. Also, Goodreads wanted to find out what makes people put down a book. A majority of the people seem to give up on a book after 50 pages. I personally think that 50 pages are not enough to decide whether or not I like a book. I want to see if the author can pull the book together and save his/herself. I do not think that this is a flaw. Most people seem to think this is so. The 50 page limit seems a little harsh for me. In my copy of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, the fiftieth page is in the middle of chapter six. There is only one of the three familiar antics of Tom in the first 50 pages.

Do not get me wrong. I love reading good books. I love books that have a plot with well-developed characters. Yet once in a while, I chose a really bad novel where the two things above are missing. There are those books where I get 50 pages in and want to quit because the author is ruining everything.These books are frustrating and I want to send the copy back to the library (FIY: When I experiment with books for fun, I always use the library. It saves a lot of money in the end). Yet, I just have this urge to finish the book no matter how bad the book is. This summer, I read Irene Iddesleigh. The author Amanda Ros has the unique title of being the world’s worst author. Here is a sample. “Such were a few remarks of Irene as she paced the beach of limited freedom, alone and unprotected. Sympathy can wound the breast of trodden patience,- it hath no rival to insure the feelings we possess, save that of sorrow.” That is in the first chapter, and there are a whole lot more. What is the truth about the author? She might try too hard. Here is the inside cover of the book:

irene-iddesleigh

While reading the book, it was hilarious to look at the outlandish language and be confused over the plot. Yet in the end, there was the satisfaction of closing the book and picking  up another book. I appreciated the next author’s work so much more after I had the encounter with this book. That is the case. How are you ever supposed to appreciate the good if you never experience the bad? Sounds like a metaphor for life.